Everyone Refers to the Concept


The Indonesian government has done a number of strategic programs in nurturing the growth of universities to be qualified as a “world class university (WCU)”, by, for instance, providing funding support of IDR 10 billion ( USD 750,000) yearly especially for several state-owned universities that hold national reputation and special legal entity status. This financial support intends to improve the performance and capability of those universities in order to be among at least the top 500 in the world ranking. With the current program to endorse WCU, it seems that Indonesian government defines and embraces the definition of WCUs as world ranking of universities.
The problem is that there are varying opinions about where the boundary falls (top 50, 100, or 500?). Interestingly, universities that are well placed in the rankings rarely use the term 'world-class'. Some scholars argue that using (global) rankings as the benchmark only makes sense if the indicators are appropriate – otherwise, governments and institutions risk transforming their system and institutions to conform to metrics designed by others for other purposes. That is the reality I suppose.
In 2020, based on the Time Higher Education System (THES) publication, there was only one Indonesian university that can sit in the 600-800 rank. Evidently, rankings of Indonesian universities have been fluctuating since 2004 until now and there were only three out of 4,685 Indonesian universities that have been ranked among the top 500 in the world ranking during that period.
However, some Indonesian universities have continuously declared themselves to be a WCU regardless of the fact that they are still far away from achieving it. Given this situation, it seems that a WCU has become an imaginary institution that the government and the respective universities aspire to be or thirst for. As mentioned by Albatch (2004), different kinds of universities in different countries claim the exalted status of a WCU often with little justification, which makes it necessary to carry out a reality checkpoint to find out the discrepancy between notions and motions towards the concept of a WCU.
The blurred vision of Indonesian government dan Indonesian universities on WCUs policy or movement is fairly understandable with reference to the unclear definition of the WCU’s concept. As Altbach observes in his much-quoted paper: “Everyone wants a world-class university. No country feels it can do without one. The problem is that no one knows what a world-class university is and no one has figured out how to get one. Everyone, however, refers to the concept” (2004, p.1).
Maybe it is high time for the policy maker to reach out more to the stakeholders and interact with the public policy domains in order to have a clear conceptualisation about the future of our ‘flaghsip universities”. Do not copy other countries slavishly. Without a proper contextualization, the adoption of such global trendy strategies or global reform measures may be proved to be counterproductive in terms of our public sector reforms.
……

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

4IR dan Kampus

Tiga Ide Besar Tentang Universitas

Paradoks Pendidikan di Indonesia